Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Billy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. 89-478PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, stating three grounds: that the trial court has proper jurisdiction, which petitioner does not challenge, that petitioner has an adequate remedy at law via a direct appeal from the denial of a similar request for a writ filed in the Court of Appeals for Licking County, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting the amount of bond. We decline to dismiss his petition on any of these grounds, and in so doing, reaffirm the holding in State v. Bevacqua (1946), 147 Ohio St.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bland v. HoldenOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. BevacquaOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In re DeFronzoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Dapice v. StickrathOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API