Legal Opinion
Parr v. Gonzalez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 2003No. A03-72PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants Anthony and Tamara Parr challenge the decision by the district court granting summary judgment in favor of respondent Zurich American Insurance Company, arguing that the district court erred by finding as a matter of law that the insurer’s policy with the insured does not provide coverage for appellants’ loss.
FACTS
Appellants entered into a contract with Midwest Cedar Timberoof (Midwest) to replace the roof on their home. Midwest hired Federico Gonzalez as a subcontractor on the project. On April 29, 1999, Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) issued a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Curtis L. Nelson v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. OrcuttDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.