Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant contractor initiated this declaratory judgment action against respondent, its insurer, to determine whether respondent had a duty to defend appellant for water-intrusion-damage claims arising out of stucco work in home construction. Appellant challenges summary judgment in favor of respondent, arguing that the district court: (1) erred in ruling that the record clearly established that the triggering event for the damage claims occurred prior to the policy period and that therefore respondent has no duty to defend; (2) improperly relied on the expert opinions…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Swenson v. HolstenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Dietz v. Langlie (In Re Farr)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bergen v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Michael S. Dietz v. Ronald LanglieUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.