Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Slade Towing Co.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 27, 1991No. Civ. A. W89-0105(B)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BARBOUR, Chief Judge.

This cause is before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs have responded to the Motion. The Court, having considered the Motion and response, together with memoranda of authorities and attachments thereto, is of the opinion that Defendants’ Motion is not well taken and should therefore be denied.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Herman L. Coleman began work at the Levingston Shipyard in Orange, Texas, as a shipfitter’s helper on December 6,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Szollosy v. Hyatt Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  2. Genusa v. Asbestos Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
  3. Bartel v. A-C Product Liability TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. BARTEL EX REL. ESTATE, RICH v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API