Bartel v. A-C Product Liability Trust
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, Chief Judge.
This is an asbestos case, joining together claims of injury due to land-based and sea-based exposures to asbestos-containing materials. At issue is the choice of law for the two claims. Once the choice of law has been established, next to be determined is whether either claim will be tried to a jury. For the following reasons, the sea-based claim will be tried under admiralty jurisdiction applying federal maritime law, and the land-based claim will be tried under diversity jurisdiction applying Montana state law. Both claims will be tried before the same jury.
Factual…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John Crane, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- BARTEL EX REL. ESTATE, RICH v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006