Legal Opinion

Davis v. Saginaw-Bay City Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1916No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Gage, J. Case by Daniel J. Davis against the Saginaw-Bay City Railway Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant upon a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The brief for appellant contains a meager statement of facts, followed by a subdivision headed “Legal Points,” which is in turn followed by one headed “Argument.” To the point where argument begins there is no reference to any error relied upon or to the manner in which any question involved is raised. Under the heading “Legal Points” it is said:

*133“It was negligence on the part of the railway company not to give due and timely warning of the approach of its cars to street intersections when a street car stopped there discharging passengers.
“It was negligence on the part of the street railway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bremer v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Borschall v. Detroit RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Clark v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Terrill v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fox v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Blatnikoff v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Terrill v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API