Clark v. Detroit United Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Sarah Clark against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Plaintiff’s testimony (no other was introduced ) tended to prove that she alighted from a westbound street car at the corner of Michigan avenue and Fifth street in the city of Detroit, passed in the rear of the car across the street, and was struck and injured by an east-bound car running on a parallel track. The tracks are separated by a space of five feet. She alighted on the north side of the north, or west-bound, track. She stood there until the car from which she had alighted had proceeded some distance — she at first testified that it was 3 *458or 4 feet, and, later, 15 feet — when she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- McCarthy v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Davis v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Terrill v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Davis v. Saginaw-Bay City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Fox v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Richardson v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Blatnikoff v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.