People v. Moyett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
The only substantive claim on appeal is the excessiveness of sentence, an issue that can be reached only on a finding that defendant’s waiver of his right of appeal is invalid. Contrary to our concurring colleague’s view, we find that the record is sufficient to show that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived that right.
It is well-settled, as the concurrence recognizes, that the right to appeal may be waived as a condition of a plea bargain (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]; see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 279-280 [1992]). Such a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MoissettNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. FairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006