Legal Opinion

People v. Hidalgo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1998PublishedCited by 1,547 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wesley, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether a defendant who enters into a plea bargain without a specific sentence promise and waives the right to appeal, loses the right to challenge the sentence in an intermediate appellate court as harsh and excessive. We hold that defendant’s unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal in this case encompassed her right to review of the sentence as harsh and excessive.

On February 24, 1996, defendant participated in a street fight, during which one of her cohorts slashed a woman in the face. On June 27, 1996, the Erie County Grand Jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. MoissettNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,547 opinions

  1. People v. LococoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. MaracleNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

1,542 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API