Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank J. Bonanno and Lawrence J. Goldstein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 9, 1998No. 96-3918, 96-4016PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, two convicted defendants challenge various aspects of their sentencing. The two defendants, Frank Bonanno and Lawrence Goldstein, were charged and convicted before a jury for their roles in a conspiracy to sell bogus auto insurance policies to innocent consumers in the State of Illinois.
Bonanno and Goldstein were each sentenced to thirty months’ incarceration and claim that the district court made several errors in sentencing. Initially, they argue that the trial judge erred in the manner in which he calculated the amount of loss that the defendants…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ashavan PurchessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert Coffman, Jerry Beller, and Thresher T. RippeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Syed Sami AhmadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Mark K. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Antonio D. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Fayez AlburayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.