Legal Opinion

United States v. Hubert R. Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1990No. 89-5476PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Hubert R. Ferguson, appeals the denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct a judgment and commitment order, contending that it does not reflect the sentencing judge’s true intent. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the denial of the motion.

I

While on parole from unrelated state convictions, Ferguson and a codefendant sold stolen vehicles which had been transported from Indiana to Kentucky. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Ferguson pleaded guilty to four counts of selling and transporting stolen vehicles moving through interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2313. He…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Michael G. Levine v. Patricia Torvik, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. George C. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Lavabit, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. John W. Gall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Anthony F. DaddinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API