McClanahan v. Breeding
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Wabash Circuit Court; A. PL. Plummer, Judge. Application by George P. MeClanahan for license to retail liquors, against which Edward Breeding and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for remonstrants, the applicant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Appellant gave the statutory notice, and on February 5, 1908, filed his application before the Board of Commissioners of the County of Wabash for a license to sell intoxicating liquors in Lagro township. By and through an attorney in fact, appellee Breeding and 474 other voters of the township filed a remonstrance on January 3, 1908, against the granting of any license. On February 5 appellant filed a verified answer that the remonstrance was void and without legal force, and that the attorney in fact was wholly without authority from the remonstrators or any of them authorizing him to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hansen v. SchallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Ex parte ModeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Behler v. AckleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Liggett v. ShriverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.