Legal Opinion
Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Metropolitan Development Commission
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1994No. 49A05-9310-CV-372PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.
Schindler Elevator Corporation and Construction Concepts, Inc. (collectively "Schindler") appeal from the trial court's adverse judgment in Schindler's suit against the Metropolitan Development Commission ("the Commission"), the Consolidated City of Indianapolis ("the City"), and Montgomery Elevator Company ("Montgomery"). Schindler initiated this action after the Commission awarded the contract for the Cirele Centre Development Project, Mall Vertical Transportation Project ("the Project") to Montgomery. We affirm.
Schindler raises two issues on appeal, only one…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Weiner v. Cuyahoga Community College DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Shook Heavy & Environmental Construction Group v. City of KokomoIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Budd v. Bd. of Co. Comrs. of St. Joseph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Faurote v. State ex rel. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interstate Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Town of New Ross v. FerrettiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gariup Construction Co. v. Carras-Szany-Kuhn & Associates, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bigley v. MSD of Wayne Township SchoolsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Cristiani v. Clark County, Indiana Solid Waste Management DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.