Legal Opinion

Bankhead v. Town of Sulligent

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1934No. 6 Div. 576PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint is by a taxpayer and resident of the town of Sulligent (a municipality with a population of less than 6,000), and seeks injunctive relief against the municipality in its proposal to issue bonds and enter into a contract as to the acquisition and operation of a combined waterworks and sewerage system for said town, as authorized by what is known as the Kelly Act, approved March 29, 1933. See Acts 1933 (Ex. Sess.) p. 88.

The bonds to be issued are known as "revenue bonds," payable as to principal and interest solely out of the revenue derived from the operation of the proposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Newberry v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Rogers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API