Legal Opinion

DeViney v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1989No. CR 89-25PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to extend the initial time within which an appeal be lodged and docketed in the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the order appealed from.

Appellant, Nancy DeViney, filed a petition for post-conviction relief under A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 following her conviction of second degree murder. She alleged that defense counsel was ineffective. The trial court found that appellant had effective representation and denied the motion. On June…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson Methodist Church v. Sewer Improvement District No. 142Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Johnson v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Harper v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. McElroy v. American Medical Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Phillips v. LaValleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Shamlin v. Quadrangle Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Clark v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Eggestein v. EggesteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. City of Little Rock v. Hermitage Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API