Legal Opinion

McElroy v. American Medical Int'l, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1989No. 88-154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The question is whether appellants substantially complied with Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 3(e). Concluding that substantial compliance was lacking, we dismiss the appeal.

This medical malpractice case resulted in a verdict for St. Mary’s Hospital and Dr. Finley Turner (defendants-appellees). After a motion for a new trial was denied, Rosemary and David McElroy (plaintiffs-appellants) filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellants designated the entire record and, as required by ARAP Rule 3(e), declared that the transcript had been ordered from the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. Alken, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Johnson v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Estes v. MasnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Venhaus v. Pulaski County Quorum CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. DeViney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Ballard v. Clark CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Shamlin v. Quadrangle Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Eggestein v. EggesteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API