Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Tudor Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 1996No. 96-177PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

Two points are raised in this appeal. The first is one of jurisdiction and concerns whether appellant Barbara Rogers effected her appeal in timely fashion. We believe that she did, and we deny the motion to dismiss by appellee Tudor Insurance Company. The second point is raised by Rogers and concerns alleged error by the trial court in granting summary judgment in favor of Tudor Insurance on the issue of whether the liability coverage carried by Tudor Insurance permitted a direct action against that carrier. We conclude that the trial court did err, and we reverse the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Omega Tube & Conduit Corp. v. MaplesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Brady v. Alken, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Davis v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Ramirez v. White County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Low v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Chambers v. SternSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Clayborn v. Bankers Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API