Legal Opinion

Phillips v. LaValle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1987No. CA 86-159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The court of appeals certified this case to us pursuant to Rule 29(1) (c) because it involves the interpretation or construction of Rule 3(e) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court of appeals earlier had reversed the trial court’s order granting appellee’s, Joe LaValle’s, timely notice of appeal and designation of record because Phillips failed to specifically state in the notice that the transcript had been ordered from the court reporter, as is provided in Rule 3(e). The court of appeals, relying on Venhaus v. Pulaski County Quorum Court, 291 Ark. 558, 726 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Venhaus v. Pulaski County Quorum CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Wise v. BarronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. DeViney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. McElroy v. American Medical Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Emis v. EmisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Emis v. EmisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API