Legal Opinion
People v. Morley
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1928No. Docket No. 1518PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant was convicted of each of the offenses of embezzlement and larceny as respectively charged in the second and fourth counts of the information, and appeals from the judgments and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
About March, 1925, the defendant was employed by the complaining witness William A. Bartholomae, Jr., as bookkeeper or office manager for Bartholomae Oil Corporation, which was owned by Bartholomae and of which he was president. Some time in the summer of 1925 an arrangement was made between Bartholomae and the defendant for dealing in stocks and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Fleet v. TichenorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. SpradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. LetourneauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. BurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.