Legal Opinion

People v. Sprado

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1925No. Docket No. 829PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant, upon an information filed in the superior court in and for the county of Sacramento, was charged with and tried for felony embezzlement and convicted of petit embezzlement and thereupon sentenced to serve a term of six months in the county jail of the said county. He duly made an application for a new trial, and the same was denied. He prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The information was based on section 508 of the Penal Code, which provides: “Every clerk, agent, or servant of any person who fraudulently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. People v. CebullaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People v. ChutnacutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McCormick v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. SourisseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. KristyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API