Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baker v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2000No. 98-556PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue before us is whether a claimant who leaves his2 former position of employment for a new position forfeits TTD eligibility under the theory of voluntary abandonment of employment.

In Baker I, we held that Baker’s voluntary departure from Stahl-Wooster precluded Baker’s eligibility for TTD, as his departure from his former position of employment was predicated on his own actions, i.e., acceptance of a truck mechanic position with Truck Stops, and not on his industrial injury. Baker, 87 Ohio St.3d at 563, 722 N.E.2d at 68. As previously mentioned, the per curiam opinion in Baker I was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State ex rel. McGraw v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Pierron v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API