Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pierron v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2008No. 2007-1460PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} At issue is appellant Richard Pierron’s eligibility for temporary total disability compensation. Pierron was seriously injured in 1973 while working as a telephone lineman for appellee Sprint/United Telephone Company.

{¶ 2} After Pierron’s injury, his doctor imposed medical restrictions that were incompatible with his former position of employment as a lineman. Sprint/United offered Pierron a light-duty warehouse job consistent with those restrictions, and Pierron continued to work in that position for the next 23 years.

{¶ 3} In 1997, Sprint/United informed Pierron that his light-duty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Black v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Klein v. Precision Excavating & Grading Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Corman v. Allied Holdings, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Floyd v. Formica Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State ex rel. McKee v. Union Metal Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API