Legal Opinion

Exeter Drilling v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1990No. 89CA2106Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

The question for review is whether Marie Sickler (claimant), widow of Melvin J. Sick-ler, should be permitted to reopen the settlement agreement with the decedent’s employer and its insurer on the ground of mistake. The Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) affirmed an order of the Administrative Law Judge (AU) granting the petition to reopen and ordering the petitioners, Exeter Drilling and Travelers Insurance Company, to pay Sickler dependency benefits. We affirm.

Melvin J. Sickler was killed during the course of his employment for Exeter Drilling in August 1976.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Industrial Commission v. RoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Loffland Bros. Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals PanelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc. v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Diamond Industries, Division of Medford Corp. v.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API