Legal Opinion

City of Huron v. Munson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1939No. File No. 8303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal by the city of Huron from an order of the learned trial court dismissing a complaint charging the defendant with the violation of an ordinance presents for determination the validity of an ordinance purporting to regulate the hour of closing of barber shops within that city. •

Express mention of the power to regulate the ancient and honorable business of barbering is not made in. any grant of power to the municipalities of this state. If it be conceded that certain general grants of power (Cf. subsection (41),' section 61.69, R. C. 1919, SDC 45.0201 (35), Chapter 193 of the 1931…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. City of Alexandria v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Newman v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Falco v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Rapid City v. RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lindquist v. Omaha Realty, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API