Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Peterson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1946No. File No. 8879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The defendant was charged with violation of an ordinance of the City of Sioux Falls in that he “drove a motor vehicle involved in an accident resulting in damage to property and failed to immediately stop at the scene of such accident and give the information required” by the ordinance. On motion of the defendant the complaint was dismissed upon the ground that the city had exceeded its powers in adopting the ordinance. The city has appealed.

Our municipal corporations derive all of their powers from the legislature. Article X, Constitution of South Dakota. Ericksen v. The City of Sioux Falls,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Webster v. KnewelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wangsness v. McAlpineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. City of Elk Point v. VaughnSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1875
  5. City of Huron v. MunsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Rapid City v. RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Anderson v. AdamsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of Aberdeen v. ForkelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Olesen v. Town (City) of HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API