Legal Opinion

Grant v. Tallassee Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 13, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Defendant has waived its exception to the refusal of the court to allow its motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. Defendant excepted to the refusal of its motion, and then offered evidence in support of its defense to plaintiff’s recovery. By the express terms of the statute, this exception was thereby waived. C. S., 567. It has been frequently so held by this Court. Gilland v. Stone Co., 189 N. C., 783, 128 S. E., 158; Nash v. Royster, 189 N. C., 408, 127 S. E., 356; Wooley v. Bruton, 184 N. C., 438, 114 S. E., 628; Smith v. Pritchard, 173 N. C., 722,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Weaver v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Wooley v. . BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Smith v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henry v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Darr v. Carolina Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Williams v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Duke Power Co. v. TomsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. White v. . CoghillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API