Legal Opinion

Williams v. Foreman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1953No. 21PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The only assignment of error requiring discussion is that based upon the entry of the compulsory nonsuit.

The party claiming a right of way by prescription has the burden of proving the several elements essential to its acquisition. McCracken v. Clark, 235 N.C. 186, 69 S.E. 2d 184; Speight v. Anderson, 226 N.C. 492, 39 S.E. 2d 371; Chesson v. Jordan, 224 N.C. 289, 29 S.E. 2d 906; McPherson v. Williams, 205 N.C. 177, 170 S.E. 662; Perry v. White, 185 N.C. 79, 116 S.E. 84.

Thus he must show, among other things, not only that a way over another’s land was used for the requisite period, but also…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Weaver v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Speight v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Mebane v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Henry v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Taylor v. BrigmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API