Legal Opinion

Mayflower Insurance v. Pellegrino

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1989No. F010685PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, J.

Michael Anthony Pellegrino and Sue Pellegrino appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause of the uninsured motorists coverage provisions of a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by plaintiff Mayflower Insurance Company. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural History

On August 1, 1986, John N. Karastathas was a passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by appellant Michael A. Pellegrino. On that date, the Pellegrino vehicle was involved in a collision caused by the operator of an uninsured…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tittle v. Enron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Wilner v. Sunset Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. City of Pomona v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Kemp Bros. Construction v. Titan Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API