Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. County of Stearns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Stearns county to recover the value of medical services rendered and medicines furnished. The action was tried before Crosby, J., (acting for the judge of the seventh district,) and a jury, and upon the close of the evidence the court directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

To meet the exigencies growing out of the presence of small-pox, in epidemic form, in several of the towns of Stc aras county, causing wide-spread alarm, the legislature, at its extra session in 1881, passed an act, approved November 4th, entitled “An act to authorize the county commissioners of Stearns county to take measures to prevent the spreading of small-pox.” Sp. Laws 1881, (Ex. Sess.) c. 104. Under its provisions the board of county com*113missioners were authorized to adopt such regulations concerning vac-eination, quarantine, and other preventive means as they might deem proper; and for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dubuque Female College v. District TownshipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  2. People ex rel. Alexander v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of New Richmond v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Morris v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Tracy Cement Tile Co. v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Peterson v. County of KoochichingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API