Legal Opinion
Elbers v. Growe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1993No. C1-92-2278PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellants Edwin Elbers and Joseph Vil-leneuve, individually and as representatives of a class of persons, filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief protecting their right to run for the elective office of sheriff as guaranteed by Minn. Const, art. VII, § 6. Appellants Larry Brinkman and David Evans, both registered voters, brought this action individually and as representatives of a class of persons, arguing they have been or will be prevented from fully exercising their right to vote for candidates who are eligible to hold the office of sheriff, as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reiff v. Interim Personnel, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Hayes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Minneapolis Term Limits Coalition v. KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Belton-Kocher v. St. Paul School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range PlanningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.