Legal Opinion

In Re Tveten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 1987No. C7-86-1580PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLEY, Justice.

Shortly before filing a petition for voluntary bankruptcy in federal court, a debtor converted significant amounts of nonexempt property into property which under Minnesota law was exempt from attachment or execution. In bankruptcy court, certain creditors filed timely objections to the debtor’s assertion of those exemptions. This action resulted from issues arising concerning the applicability of Minnesota’s debtor exemption laws. The United States Bankruptcy Court has certified to this court four questions of law involving our state’s property exemption statutes. 1…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Forsberg v. Security State Bank of CanovaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Guilliams v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Sholdan v. DietzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. TvetenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Addison v. SeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Panuska v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API