Legal Opinion

Griffen v. Newcom

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1951No. 4-9545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Milewee, Justice.

Appellant, Raymond Griffen, instituted this proceeding by habeas corpus for custody of his nine-year-old daughter against the appellees, Earl Newcom and wife, who are the child’s maternal grandparents. The chancellor found that appellees were entitled to retain custody of the child and dismissed appellant’s petition for want of equity.

Appellant and Norma Newcom, daughter of appellees, were married in September, 1939, and the child, Eamola Ann, was born in November, 1940. Appellant and Norma were living in St. Louis, Missouri, in the spring of 1942 when they separated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Verser v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  2. Washaw v. GimbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Loewe v. ShookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Coulter v. SypertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Kirk v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cushman v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Henry v. JanesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Kimberling v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API