Kirk v. Jones
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). Minors are the wards of chancery courts, and it is the duty of such courts to make any orders that would properly safeguard their rights. This is a habeas corpus proceedings and the court had the authority to grant the custody of the child to the aunt, provided it finds that the father had forfeited his rights thereto. Three parties are interested in the custody of minor children, the State, the parents, and the child itself. While the right of the father to the custody of his child is paramount, this is denied in many cases, and, regard being had for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washaw v. GimbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Coulter v. SypertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Clark v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chandler v. ChandlerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Robins v. Arkansas Social ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Massey v. FlinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.