Legal Opinion

Coulter v. Sypert

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 1906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Howard Chancery Court; James D. Shaver, Chancellor; The welfare of the child is of paramount importance. The courts are not bound to deliver the custody of the child into the hands of any particular claimant, but will exercise a sound discretion, and leave the child in such custody as may appear best for it. Hurd on Hab. Corp. 528; Tyler on Infancy and Coverture, § 187 and cases cited; 37 Ark. 31; 50 Ark. 351; 32 Ark. 92.

1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.

This is a contest between a father and grandfather for the custody of a boy, about ten years old, named Richmond Sypert.

Henry Sypert married Caroline Coulter, the daughter of Joe Coulter. The issue of this marriage'was Richmond Sypert. Caroline, being in bad health and her husband failing or refusing to secure for-her needed medical attention, returned to her parents in the fall of one year, and lingered there until the spring of the next year, and died. He did nothing for her in her last illness, and visited her only once. Richmond, his son, at this time was about one year old. His father…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mercein v. People ex rel. BarryNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. United States v. GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1824
  3. McShan v. McShanMississippi Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BenearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Baker v. DurhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Kirk v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Garlin v. GarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API