Legal Opinion

Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 17, 1999No. CA 98-1343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

Appellant, Martha S. Davis, was ordered by the Randolph County Chancery Court to pay child support in the amount of $70.00 a month. For reversal, appellant contends that the Chancery Court erred in finding that Supplemental Security Income [hereinafter “SSI”] is “income” from which child support can be assessed. We have found no cases specifically mentioning the issue of Supplemental Security Income, but in examining the law as it relates to “income” for purposes of setting child support in the State of Arkansas, we now conclude that SSI is “income,” and we affirm.

On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Child Support Enforcement v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Secretary, Kansas State Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API