City of New York v. De Lury
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
We recently decided, in Rankin v. Shanker (23 1ST Y 2d 111), that public employees and labor organizations representing them were not entitled to a trial by jury in a criminal contempt proceeding for the violation of sec*179tion 210 (subd. 1) of the Taylor Law.1 In so holding, we concluded that a legislative classification ‘ ‘ which differentiates between strikes by public employees and employees in private industry ” is reasonable and does not offend against the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the laws (23 N Y 2d, at p. 118). The case now before us calls upon the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- International Union, U. A. W. A., A. F. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- City of San Diego v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 127California Court of Appeal · 1970
- McTigue v. New London Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Board of Junior College District No. 508 v. Cook County College Teachers Union, Local 1600Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Labor Relations Commission v. Boston Teachers UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.