Legal Opinion

Speelmon Elevated Tank Service v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

Appellants’ contention that Joyce Ann is not a dependent under sec. 102.51 (1), Stats., is without merit. That section provides, so far as material:

“The following shall be conclusively presumed to be solely and wholly dependent for support upon a deceased employee: . . . a child under the age of eighteen years (or over said age, but physically or mentally incapacitated from earning), upon the parent with whom he is living at the time of the death of such parent, . . . The charging of any portion of the support and maintenance of a child upon one of the parents, or any voluntary contribution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wendlandt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. C. F. Trantow Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Shea v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wacker v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Zweig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chappy v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Witek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. KeehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API