Legal Opinion
Shea v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRry, C. J.
The question presented is whether or not Gerald Emmett Shea, the son, was entitled to share in the award as one dependent upon Timothy R. Shea for support. A determination of this question involves an interpretation of sec. 102.51 (1), Stats., which provides:
“The following shall be conclusively presumed to be solely and wholly dependent for support upon a deceased employee: A wife upon a husband with whom she is living at the time of his death; ... a child under the age of eighteen years . . . upon the parent with whom he is living at the time of the death of such parent. ... In case of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zilley v. DunwiddieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Miller's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Western Indiana Gravel Co. v. Erwin, Gdn.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Schade v. SchadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Speelmon Elevated Tank Service v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Wade ex rel. Ireton v. Scherrer & Bennett Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.