Legal Opinion
C. F. Trantow Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1952PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The court below was convinced that the commission acted within its jurisdiction in entering the order of September 5, 1950. The decision, as far as the jurisdictional question is concerned, follows the statutes. Sec. 102.16 (1), Stats. 1949, provides:
“Any controversy concerning compensation, including any in which the state may be a party, shall be submitted to said commission in the manner and with the effect provided in this chapter. Every compromise of any claim for compensation may be reviewed and set aside, modified, or confirmed by the commission within one year from the date such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. Retail Gasoline Dealers Ass'n of Milwaukee, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Hayes v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Baker v. LeenhoutsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Wisconsin Axle Division v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Holy Name School of the Congregation of the Holy Name of Jesus of Kimberly v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.