Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Wright

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 18, 1958No. 6321PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the action of the examiner in rejecting claims 24 to 27 and 42 to 45 of the application of Alexander M. Wright, entitled “Control System for Turbo-Jet Engines,” serial No. 219,594, filed April 6, 1951. Claims 1 to 28,28 to 41, and 48 to 51 stand allowed.

Claims 24 and 42 are representative of the appealed claims:

24. For an aircraft turbo-jet engine having a main combustion chamber and a fuel pump for supplying fuel thereto, a tailpipe with means for supplying and burning additional fuel therein, and an exhaust gas nozzle with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Application of WorrestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. In re CusterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  4. Application of BerlinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. In Re RundellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tinnerman Products, Inc. v. George K. Garrett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Application of Everett F. GustafsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Pfizer Inc. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  4. In re TouvayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. In re GiolitoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API