Legal Opinion

In re Giolito

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 12, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 75-612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3 to 6 in application serial No. 824,358, filed April 30, 1969, entitled “Methane Sulfonyl Chloride and Process of Preparation.” We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The Invention

Appellants’ invention comprises a continuous process for producing methane sulfonyl chloride by the simultaneous hy*398drolysis and chlorination of methyl mer-captan (methane thiol). Claim 1 is illustrative:

1. A continuous process for producing methane sulfonyl chloride…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of John L. Margaroli and Earl J. HesseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Application of LaunderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. In re MottCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API