In re Giolito
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3 to 6 in application serial No. 824,358, filed April 30, 1969, entitled “Methane Sulfonyl Chloride and Process of Preparation.” We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The Invention
Appellants’ invention comprises a continuous process for producing methane sulfonyl chloride by the simultaneous hy*398drolysis and chlorination of methyl mer-captan (methane thiol). Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A continuous process for producing methane sulfonyl chloride…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of John L. Margaroli and Earl J. HesseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of LaunderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re MottCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976