Oklahoma City v. Tucker
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma Coimty; John W. Hayson, Judge. Howard A. Tucker was convicted of violating an ordinance of Oklahoma City. On appeal to the county court the complaint was set aside, and the City appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
This action was begun in the police court in Oklahoma City in May, 1913, by the filing of a complaint in the name of said city against Howard A. Tucker, charging, or attempting to charge, the violation of a city ordinance. A judgment was given adverse to Tucker and an appeal taken by him to the county court of Oklahoma county, as provided by law. When the cause came on for hearing in the county court, a motion to set aside the complaint was filed on behalf of Tucker and sustained by the court. From this judgment of the county court the city of Oklahoma City has attempted to appeal to this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- City of St. Louis v. MarchelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Mudge v. Kansas National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- City of Salina v. WaitSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- City of St. Louis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- State v. GradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Clovis v. CurryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
- Castle Dale City v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. RearWashington Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.