Legal Opinion

Mudge v. Kansas National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1896No. 8890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. Action by The Kansas National Bank of Topeka and others against M. R. Mudge. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings the case here. The opinion, filed January 11, 1896, contains a sufficient statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

This proceeding in error is founded on a case-made, the validity of which is challenged upon the ground that it does not appear to have been settled by the trial court. Appended to the case is a certificate which recites: “And now, on this 28th day of June, 1892, come the parties by their attorneys, and present this made case to me for final settlement ; and, having considered said made case, and the amendments suggested thereto, I do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, complete, and correct record of all the pleadings, process,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. ConeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Allen v. KruegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. TuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Castle Dale City v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  4. City of Topeka v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API