Legal Opinion
State v. Rear
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1940No. 27995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.
This action was instituted in justice court by the filing of a complaint, the charging part of which is as follows:
“They, said George Rear, Lee Hickman and Continental Securities Company, and each of them, in the County of King, State of Washington, on or about the 15th day of November, 1939, wilfully and unlawfully did caravan and cause to be car vanned, motor vehicles into the aforesaid county and state, crossing of the State line of said Vehickles being accomplished by Ferry without first having procured permits from the Director of Licenses so to do . . .”
The complaint was based upon the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. B'GosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Portland v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- State Ex Rel. Foley v. YuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Oklahoma City v. TuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- Speer v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- State v. Cascade District CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- People of Puerto Rico v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960