Legal Opinion

Castle Dale City v. Woolley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1923No. 3920PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application by Castle Dale City for a writ of mandate to Dilwortb Woolley, as Judge of the District Court of Emery County, to reinstate and assume jurisdiction of an appeal from a judgment of tbe city justice’s court for defendant Roy Miller, in an action for violation of a city ordinance.

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to Hon. Dil-worth Woolley, as judge of the district court of Emery county, Utah, requiring him to reinstate and assume jurisdiction of an appeal from a city justice’s court, which was dismissed in the district court. '.Responding to an alternative writ, the defendant has demurred to the plaintiff’s affidavit or application.

The plaintiff’s affidavit alleges, in substance, as follows: That on May 31, 1922, in an action pending in the city justice’s court of Castle Dale City, for the violation of a city ordinance prosecuted by Castle Dale City against…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. City of Sheridan v. CadleWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  3. City of Durango v. ReinsbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Portland v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Mayor of Hawkinsville v. EthridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Marquette v. Police CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Town of Ophir v. JorgensenUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Salina City v. FreeceUtah Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API