In re the Estate of Pratt
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The accounting party here is the ancillary administrator c. t. a., d. b. n. Objections have been filed to his account by the next of kin of the deceased sole legatee under the will of the testator.(1) A preliminary question arose during the proceeding as to the right of these parties to appear. The surrogate held that the next of kin were entitled to intervene. The accounting administrator was originally appointed in Alabama, the State of residence of the testator. He is also the administrator there of the deceased sole legatee’s estate. His contention in effect is that he may…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of Fulton Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Green v. CrapoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Fisher v. . BantaNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of KentNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of ChavesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of BaldwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Fortune v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- In re the Estate of FrameNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.