Legal Opinion

Fortune v. First Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1937No. Nos. 30,951, 30,974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

When plaintiff rested defendants did likewise for the “purpose of making a motion for dismissal” of plaintiff’s cause, requesting the “privilege of reopening and introducing testimony if the motion is overruled.” The court granted the requested privilege, plaintiff not objecting, and defendants then moved “that this action be dismissed on the ground that the evidence does not justify findings or a judgment against either defendant.” After hearing arguments of respective counsel the court granted the motion. Later defendants were permitted,' over plaintiff’s objection,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. In Re the Accounting of Fulton Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Green v. CrapoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Under Will of ComstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Steiner v. HAWAIIAN TRUST CO., LTD.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In Re Trusts Under Will of McCannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. In Re the Trusteeship of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Young v. BlandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API