Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Frame
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 26, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
There is little to be added to the thorough, comprehensive and learned opinion of the referee, and his very complete report on the issues in these proceedings. His report will be confirmed. Only a few matters require even brief discussion:(1) Doubt is expressed by the referee on page 11 of his opinion as to whether the facts would have justified the executors in retaining the non-legal securities from 1925 to 1932 in the absence of the consent of the beneficiaries. He has found that there was acquiescence, particularly by the principal beneficiaries, Bertha F. Mason and Emlen P.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of Fulton Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In Re Estate of MathesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In re Compel an Accounting in the Estate of VaretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- In re the Estate of PrattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of HirschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of GravesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re the Estate of CannariatoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of MerzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937