Legal Opinion

Perfection Mattress & Spring Co. v. Windham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1938No. 6 Div. 270PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The defendant mattress company (to so designate it for brevity) owned a truck with a flat body extending over the fenders. Plaintiff, a boy seventeen years of age, was seated on the body of the truck with his feet hanging over the sides, when, in going through an underpass in Birmingham, it was run too close to the wall, resulting in rather serious injury to plaintiff’s knees.

Plaintiff’s complaint is based upon the theory that he was an invitee of defendant, and was injured as a result of negligence of defendant’s servant or agent after discovery of plaintiff’s perilous…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Reynolds v. BuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Busby v. Truswal Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Joyner v. Aaa Cooper TransportationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Perkins v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Martin v. Anniston Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API