Legal Opinion

Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1935No. 1 Div. 871PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

This court will not review the Court of Appeals on its finding of facts, either as to the tendencies of the evidence, or upon the effect of the evidence in considering the giving or refusing of the affirmative charge by the trial court, or the weight of the evidence on review of a ruling on a motion for new trial.

The general rule is that this court will not review the ruling of the Court of Appeals in its application of the law to the facts. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. But if the decision of the Court of Appeals affirmatively shows a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Dowdell v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Fletcher v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Horsley v. HorsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Rainey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. O. L. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Hunt v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API